How do cytopathologists learn fine needle aspiration techniques? An international survey.

INTRODUCTION: Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a widely accepted diagnostic technique, but performance varies according to expertise. Little is known about variation in FNAC training practices worldwide. We surveyed pathologists using social media networks to determine FNAC training practices internationally. DESIGN: Pathologists were surveyed on questions related to FNAC simulation training using direct messaging on the Twitter and WhatsApp platforms. Survey responses over a period of 2 weeks were collected. RESULTS: In total, 149 pathologists participated (96.1% response rate). The respondents came from 24 countries and 87 institutions. The majority of the pathologists (63.8%) performed FNAC directly on patients for the first time. Only 36.2% of them had simulation instruction during their training. It was performed on food items such as fruit (64.8%), surgical specimens (37.0%), autopsies (13.0%) and others (9.3%), including commercially available phantom simulators for ultrasound-guided FNAC (US-FNAC) (two pathologists). DISCUSSION: Most pathologists did not receive formal training in a simulated environment, and of the pathologists who had simulation instruction, food items were commonly used for education. A few participants used a commercial US-FNAC simulator, but since most pathologists perform FNAC by palpation, this method of simulation training is not applicable to many practices. Social media is an effective and efficient way to perform survey research, yielding a very high response rate.

#FNAFriday: How cytopathologists learn, teach, and share knowledge on Twitter.

BACKGROUND: Twitter is an expanding social media network among cytopathologists to share knowledge. Tweets are made up of text which may also include images or video. All tweets labeled under a hashtag can be tracked. The #FNAFriday hashtag was created in 2015 by one of the authors (X.J.) to build a community of individuals, to educate and share interesting cases, and highlight a variety of diagnoses with FNA specimens. METHODS: We retrospectively extracted all tweets labeled with #FNAFriday from April 2015 to mid-February 2019 (47 mo) using the Twitter search engine. The data point included: author, number of figures, type of cytology-stain, use of immunocytochemistry, histochemistry or molecular techniques, and the subspeciality. The educational content was categorized as: live-tweeting, training activities, and publication references. The number if comments, retweets and likes was also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 349 original tweets using #FNAFriday were tracked with an average of 7.43 tweets/month. We describe the "top three" countries with most tweets, active users and subspecialties. The most frequent stain was Papanicolau and part of the content of the tweets was using cellblock (14.04%), histologic correlation (10.03%), immunocytochemistry (8.60%), molecular tests (2.01%), gross pictures (4.58%), and radiologic pictures (3.4%). CONCLUSION: The presence of cytopathologists on Twitter who want to share their cases has increased. The weekly FNAFriday label with other cytology hashtags is a specific keyword for those interested in the field.

Residencia de Anatomía Patológica en España: ¿cómo estamos y en qué debemos mejorar? / Pathology training in Spain: what is the status quo and how should we improve?

Existe una evidente preocupación a nivel mundial por la falta de popularidad de la especialidad de Anatomía Patológica entre los estudiantes de medicina y por las altas tasas de abandono durante la residencia. En España la situación es similar, con una tasa de deserción estimada superior al 20% cada año. En el presente estudio, se propone analizar transversalmente los factores relacionados con la motivación, formación docente y satisfacción respecto al periodo de formación, mediante una encuesta dirigida a residentes de 3.er y 4.o año de formación y adjuntos en sus 3 primeros años como especialistas. Obtuvimos un total de 155 participantes de diferentes comunidades autónomas. Según nuestros resultados, la Anatomía Patológica en España es una especialidad con altos niveles de satisfacción entre quienes la eligen. La sensación de satisfacción con la especialidad se correlacionó significativamente con dos factores: el conocimiento previo que se tenía sobre ella en el momento de elegirla y la calidad de la formación docente recibida. Detectamos cierta heterogeneidad en los centros de formación, y los puntos más débiles que necesitan ser mejorados son la formación en la realización de técnicas moleculares, en la metodología para la investigación y en la punción-aspiración con aguja fina. Mejorar la calidad de la formación recibida es factible y atañe a todos aquellos especialistas que desempeñan funciones docentes en hospitales acreditados para la formación de residentes

The unpopularity of Pathology among medical students is of concern worldwide, as is the high drop-out rate during the speciality training programme. Spain is no exception, with an estimated annual drop-out rate greater than 20%. In the present study, we aimed to analyse factors related to motivation, teaching and satisfaction with post-graduate training. Postgraduates in their 3rd and 4th year of speciality training programmes and pathologists during their first three years as specialists were asked to fill in a questionnaire; 155 participants from different parts of Spain took part in the study. Our results revealed a high level of satisfaction among those who had chosen pathology as their specialty and that their satisfaction correlated significantly with two factors: a previous knowledge of the speciality when choosing it and the quality of the training received. We detected certain differences amongst different training centres. The weakest points and thus those that need to be improved were training in molecular techniques, research methods and fine needle aspiration. Improving speciality training is certainly possible and should be the concern of all those who are responsible for postgraduate education in teaching hospitals

[Pathology training in Spain: What is the status quo and how should we improve?] / Residencia de Anatomía Patológica en España: ¿cómo estamos y en qué debemos mejorar?

The unpopularity of Pathology among medical students is of concern worldwide, as is the high drop-out rate during the speciality training programme. Spain is no exception, with an estimated annual drop-out rate greater than 20%. In the present study, we aimed to analyse factors related to motivation, teaching and satisfaction with post-graduate training. Postgraduates in their 3rd and 4th year of speciality training programmes and pathologists during their first three years as specialists were asked to fill in a questionnaire; 155 participants from different parts of Spain took part in the study. Our results revealed a high level of satisfaction among those who had chosen pathology as their specialty and that their satisfaction correlated significantly with two factors: a previous knowledge of the speciality when choosing it and the quality of the training received. We detected certain differences amongst different training centres. The weakest points and thus those that need to be improved were training in molecular techniques, research methods and fine needle aspiration. Improving speciality training is certainly possible and should be the concern of all those who are responsible for postgraduate education in teaching hospitals.

Extraparenchymal ovarian and testicular Leydig cells: ectopic/heterotopic or orthotopic?

PURPOSE: We are conducting a prospective study trying to determine, in both sexes, the frequency of appearance of ectopic Leydig cells, their preferred location, their relationship with nerve structures and the possible causes of their appearance. METHODS: We have studied 86 cases that were removed according to different clinical indications for pathological study: uterine leyomiomas (n = 12), ovarian cystadenoma (n = 4), endometrial hyperplasia (n = 8), endometrial carcinoma (n = 12), cervical carcinoma (n = 4), seminoma (n = 4), fallopian tube ligatures (n = 24), vasectomies (n = 8), nonspecific orchiepididymitis (n = 2), and unknown (n = 8). RESULTS: We have observed ectopic Leydig cells in 13/86 cases (15.11%), 9/72 in the female samples (12.50%) and 4/14 in male samples (28.57%). The most frequent location was the mesosalpinx (4 of 13: 30.76%). CONCLUSIONS: These high figures lead us to believe that the ectopia of Leydig cells is not really a pathologic entity, but a finding related to specific functions yet to be determined.

Tuberculosis de la vesícula biliar; un dilema diagnóstico con el carcinoma de vesícula metastásico / Tuberculosis of the gallbladder vs metastatic vesicular carcinoma; a diagnostic dilemma

No disponible